Oil discussions..... Always lively
I think we can all agree, oil has made significant improvements over the last 70 years, right? Multi weights of the 50s were marginal at best, right? All opinion with lots of links to prove one way or another. aka ZINC
Claims about "old engines are looser" or had larger tolerances than today's engines can easily be proven or disproven. These claims are often perpetuated here and all other automotive forums but let's take a look. Let's compare our engine to a modern 5.7l HEMI and we shall see...
Rod bearing clearance: 230cu 0.0005 to 0.0015 / 5.7l 0.0007 to 0.0029 ----- oops
Main bearing clearance: 230cu 0.0005 to 0.0015 / 5.7l 0.0009 to 0.002 ---- another oops
Now that we have established our flatheads are actually built with slightly tighter bearing tolerances, this is where is gets less about the numbers... Modern engines have much shorter strokes and much much lighter reciprocating parts. Our long stroke, long heavy rod, fully skirted heavy pistoned engines are throwing ALOT more weight around. This is where a heavier oil is needed for a 'cushion' as the rod bearings are smashed into the journals by all this rotating mass.
Though I did not look up these specs, I would expect our cylinder wall clearances to be larger due to the sheer mass of our pistons and the associated expansion rates that come with that mass. Another reason I advocate modern, lighter pistons on a rebuild. There is no logical reason to keep our lead slugs? Maybe cost?
No oil recommendations from me, use what tickles you and I know what weight I prefer.
As to the OP, if you are getting oil sucked UP through your valve guides, adding positive seals is not the correct approach, find and fix the issue.