Jump to content

1948 D25 2nd gear selection issues.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, seeking advice from the brains trust! I have an intermittent issue with second gear (both changing up first-second or changing down third-second) where the gear either won't engage, or will pop out). After various attempts to adjust the linkage the gearbox was pulled, disassembled and professionally rebuilt by a trusted repairer with all new internals, and a good 'old school' mechanic has had a couple of goes at adjusting the shift linkage since, but the problem still persists. First, Third and Reverse slot in perfectly. The advice I've had here in Oz is possibly too much float/end play in the second gear set, or possible misalignment between the gearbox and clutch housing-I believe there are shims for the latter? I took the car out for a drive yesterday and found that if I held onto the shifter for a few seconds after making the change that it would generally stay in second. I'm really trying to avoid pulling the 'box again and sending it back to the repairer for checking, as the logistics for this are involved, but I seem to be running out of options.  This is driving me nuts and spoiling what is otherwise a great drive-any thoughts/advice would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. 

Posted
On 1/27/2025 at 12:06 AM, Nigel Bailey said:

Penrite Transoil T90, which is the same as the SAE 90 Gear Oil listed in my service manual. 

Be sure it is rated GL-1

Posted

Just throw my 2 cents in .... The fluids available today are far superior to what was available when these vehicles were made.

They suggested GL1 back then because it is all that was available.

 

I'm using 85-140 GL5 from walmart because it is easily available to me. .... And it is cheap!

The 85 is a little thinner then the 90 .... 140 is offering higher protection and GL5 means it has more special additives to it.

The main concern is to read the label and verify the oil protects soft metals .... after a large lawsuit a couple decades ago, most if not all do .... just read the label.

 

You will get many opinions when talking about oil .... my opinion on GL1 is, I would not use it in a old farm tractor that sits in a field .... when there are better and cheaper oils available.

 

The next question would be, How are your engine mounts?

If your rubber mounts are deteriorated, shrunken and hard .... it could cause excessive play in the linkage and mess with your shifting.

Posted

The issue with GL5 is in some applications (like my P15) it is too good! The superior lubricity may not allow the syncros in our vintage trannys to grip the gears sufficiently to allow smooth meshing. It was only after I replaced GL5 with Redline MTL that the syncros began functioning as designed and smooth shifting in all temps is now the norm.  I wouldn't discourage anyone from using GL1 if it works well in a particular transmission. It appears the Penrite Transoil is a modern take on GL1 and is most likely a fine option since it is intended for vintage vehicles.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Los_Control said:

Just throw my 2 cents in .... The fluids available today are far superior to what was available when these vehicles were made.

They suggested GL1 back then because it is all that was available.

 

I'm using 85-140 GL5 from walmart because it is easily available to me. .... And it is cheap!

The 85 is a little thinner then the 90 .... 140 is offering higher protection and GL5 means it has more special additives to it.

The main concern is to read the label and verify the oil protects soft metals .... after a large lawsuit a couple decades ago, most if not all do .... just read the label.

 

You will get many opinions when talking about oil .... my opinion on GL1 is, I would not use it in a old farm tractor that sits in a field .... when there are better and cheaper oils available.

 

The next question would be, How are your engine mounts?

If your rubber mounts are deteriorated, shrunken and hard .... it could cause excessive play in the linkage and mess with your shifting.

Thanks yes; I've belatedly remembered that the engine mounts were all renewed as part of the overhaul, as the old ones were fairly worn. Although now 'correct', there may have been some compensating adjustments done over time as the mounts deteriorated, or perhaps the alignment of the engine/clutch housing etc is not quite right? Another avenue for investigation-thanks! 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Terms of Use