Dave72dt Posted December 18 Report Posted December 18 Maybe take a look at the plugs once more now that you have some miles on it. Your first statement back in September mentioned key codes and TPS out of range. Out of range can be an indication of a poor ground. Chrysler had a habit of tying multiple sensors together with a single ground as well as having multiple ground locations. Check them once again for any indications of that green corrosion on the terminals. Fresh, bright copper wire with a fresh terminal on it. Quote
Los_Control Posted December 19 Author Report Posted December 19 21 hours ago, Dave72dt said: Maybe take a look at the plugs once more now that you have some miles on it. Your first statement back in September mentioned key codes and TPS out of range. Out of range can be an indication of a poor ground. Chrysler had a habit of tying multiple sensors together with a single ground as well as having multiple ground locations. Check them once again for any indications of that green corrosion on the terminals. Fresh, bright copper wire with a fresh terminal on it. That's good advice there Dave .... I pulled a plug to take a peek. ... almost 1500 miles on them. I think my next plan, after the Holidays ... Is to pull the plenum. Both vacuum and electrical run under it and I will get a chance to spend time and make sure I did not miss something when I installed it. All the main harness plugs I cleaned and used dielectric grease on them .... except the ones I missed Doing the engine swap, I may have got in a hurry and missed something when connecting those items and installing the plenum .... double check my work. Also this plenum I noticed has a lot of oil in it from when the engine blew up ... I have been moving the plenum and all the sensors/TB over to the new engine .... The old dried oil is 3 years old now and I doubt it would be a issue ... I have 2 clean plenums so will swap it out. I also have the modified fuel rail that is working fine and the injectors have 188K miles on them. I do not think it is a injector issue, but have 2 other sets of injectors can clean and test then install them. Currently just frustrated with it and need to step away from it before I blow it up 1 Quote
Sniper Posted December 21 Report Posted December 21 (edited) On 12/16/2024 at 9:47 PM, JBNeal said: This may or may not help: When I fiddled with PCM mapping back in the day, the problem here sounds like the PCM is trying to switch to closed loop mode but the injectors are stuck in open loop mode, hence the rich fuel code, almost like a relay is sticking somewhere. I'm not familiar with the Chrysler specific fuel delivery circuitry, so I'm not sure if this relay is modular or soldered to the PCM. The only relay in the mopar injector circuit is the one that feeds 12v to all the injectors. The computer uses injector drivers (solid state device, not a relay) to trigger the injectors on/off via the ground. Those usually either work, or do not work, very rarely are they intermittent. Either the coolant temp sensor, the one for the computer not the dash gauge, is flaky, you have a leaky injector or the PCM is wonky. If you have the ability to measure the fuel pressure at the injector rails you can see how fast that pressure bleeds down, if it's quick you have a leaky injector(s). Have you run the codes? Edited December 21 by Sniper 2 Quote
Los_Control Posted December 21 Author Report Posted December 21 5 minutes ago, Sniper said: Either the coolant temp sensor, the one for the computer not the dash gauge, is flaky, you have a leaky injector or the PCM is wonky. If you have the ability to measure the fuel pressure at the injector rails you can see how fast that pressure bleeds down, if it's quick you have a leaky injector(s). Have you run the codes? Only code right now is (52) rich fuel mixture. I have replaced the fuel pump, fuel filter, fuel pressure regulator. I have checked the fuel pressure at the rail and is exactly what it should be .... pressure takes several minute to bleed down when shut off. I did swap the original pcm with a used pcm, and made zero difference .... pcm is good or both bad in the exact same way. Not sure what you mean by coolant sensor .... have done nothing with it .... dash gauge seems to be accurate. Quote
Sniper Posted Saturday at 12:49 PM Report Posted Saturday at 12:49 PM (edited) 8 hours ago, Los_Control said: Not sure what you mean by coolant sensor .... have done nothing with it .... dash gauge seems to be accurate. Back then there were two coolant temps sensors, one for the gauge and one for the computer. If the one for the computer is sending bad data to the PCM then it may be the reason it's running rich. Essentially, it's telling the computer I am not warmed up so the computer stays in open loop and it runs rich once the engine is actually up to temperature. Gauge sender PCM sender OBD1 isn't sophisticated enough for you to actually look at the data and see if this is the case, unfortunately. OBDII is smart enough to let you do that, which cuts down on the issue of shotgunning parts, but at the expense of a costly scanner. Edited Saturday at 12:51 PM by Sniper Quote
Los_Control Posted Saturday at 02:09 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 02:09 PM Thank's @Sniper, I was not aware there are 2 coolant sensors. OTOH, I have lots of spare parts with 2 junk engines. 🙄 .... Sure I have another one around to test with. Certainly is plausible ... never happens til after you run it a ways on the highway and always after the same period of time on the same stretch of road ..... shortly after the engine is good and warmed up. And it started after installing this engine, could have been DOA. Kinda puzzled now, it has been a few months since I installed engine .... really can not remember that sensor .... wondering if I even plugged it in? 🤔 ... sure I did but am curious. I have since changed every sensor on the engine and just cant place that one. I will have to take a look today and see if I can change it. Quote
JBNeal Posted Saturday at 09:48 PM Report Posted Saturday at 09:48 PM 17 hours ago, Sniper said: ... Either the coolant temp sensor, the one for the computer not the dash gauge, is flaky, you have a leaky injector or the PCM is wonky. If you have the ability to measure the fuel pressure at the injector rails you can see how fast that pressure bleeds down, if it's quick you have a leaky injector(s)... You're absolutely correct, if that PCM temp sensor is sending faulty information, then the PCM gets "confused" and spits out codes...I learned a long time ago that oxygen sensors are prone to getting "lazy" as they age since the sensor materials are in a harsh environment. I had a friend with a 2004 Matrix that she bought new, and in 2021 I told her it did not sound right, asked her when she last changed the O2 sensors, she just looked at me funny and changed the subject...6 months later in February, the CEL illuminated, my scanner kicked out O2 sensor codes, swapped those 2 rusty cusses out, and that thing ran smooth and quiet and was FAST, she said it had not run that good in years and accused me of being some kind of witch...a few weeks later, she got her first speeding ticket in a school zone, and she blamed my witchcraft skillz and not her lead foot 😁 1 Quote
Los_Control Posted Saturday at 10:04 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 10:04 PM I tried changing the sensor and made no difference .... It started acting up as normal about 20 miles outside of town as it always does. .... took the back way home at 50mph and ran fine. Not sure how to test the wiring there ... turned the key on and with a 12V test light got no power to the sensor. It could be less then 12V or may need car running to actually get a signal .... have to remove the coil to get to it so no starting the car. I honestly believe now I have changed every sensor that connects to the pcm .... back to removing the plenum and go over all the electrical and vacuum Quote
Sniper Posted Sunday at 12:21 AM Report Posted Sunday at 12:21 AM The PCM sensor uses 5v from the PCM, it sends a voltage back to the PCM that varies depending on it's temperature and the PCM interprets that returned voltage as a temperature reading. OBD1 is not nearly as sophisticated as OBD2. Example: Coolant temp reads 50F, ambient reads 70F, intake air temp reads 125F. All are "valid" temperatures as far as the range of over all expectations go. After 5 minutes of running the coolant temp doesn't change. OBD1 thinks "it's in a valid range", OBD2 says "wait a minute", OBD2 knows that value should have gone up and based on load, run time, ambient temps and intake air temps has a pretty good estimation of where it should be and if it's not there will throw a code. OBD1 will not as it doesn't do that type of calculations. Now if the coolant temp sensor returns an invalid signal, such as not having 5v going to the sensor, OBD2 will throw a code. OBD1 might. This is really where being able to view the live data from that sensor comes in handy, One thing I found when putting together the parts for my EFI swap was a source that listed the data and values from the various sensors I am using. Microsquirt (my PCM) will let me look at that data live so I can see a flaky sensor that returns an "in range" value that is not correct. Such as telling me my coolant temperature is 50F, which is "in range" for that sensor, when it's actually past the thermostat opening temperature. Don't forget a grounded signal line from the sensor to the PCM will also confuse it. Unfortunately, I only have GM sensor data, but if we knew what the data was for your sensors we could back probe the voltage to the PCM and see if what's going there is rational or not. Quote
Los_Control Posted Sunday at 01:18 AM Author Report Posted Sunday at 01:18 AM 45 minutes ago, Sniper said: OBD1 is not nearly as sophisticated as OBD2. Thats why it is suppose to be easier to work on older OBD1 cars 🤣 I have been thinking about one of the MT2500 scanners, several on Ebay for about $300 .... they have some cheaper .... think it is important to get all the literature and extra connections that come with them .... A complete set. This one seems to be all there and $300 .... will not give the same info as a OBD2 scanner but will be better then what I have now. To be honest, I'm not sold on the idea this scanner would really help me much in my current situation .... it might give me a better clue though. Quote
Sniper Posted Sunday at 02:26 AM Report Posted Sunday at 02:26 AM I don't know enough to know if it reads lie data or not. The factory too is called DRB scan tool. In Ebay it's in excess of $2k. I did find the user manual online though, It doesn't specifically mention it can read OBD1 sensors Quote
kencombs Posted Sunday at 05:06 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:06 PM 14 hours ago, Sniper said: I don't know enough to know if it reads lie data or not. The factory too is called DRB scan tool. In Ebay it's in excess of $2k. I did find the user manual online though, It doesn't specifically mention it can read OBD1 sensors The bolded word above was an accurate typo. If the sensor lies we need to know. 1 Quote
oldodge41 Posted Monday at 08:53 PM Report Posted Monday at 08:53 PM Are you able to see your fuel pressure while it is acting up? The fact that it builds and holds pressure when the engine is off or at idle/low rpm doesn't necessarily correlate to what pressure/flow it is able to sustain after running for 20-30 minutes, has heated up and sufficient flow/pressure is needed to sustain high speed cruising. I keep going back to why does it run ok at lower speed. Quote
oldodge41 Posted Monday at 08:58 PM Report Posted Monday at 08:58 PM Also, how is the tank vented? Maybe try running with the gas cap off, if you haven't, just for grins and giggles. Any soft fuel line that could be collapsing? Best of luck, I can't wait to see what finally fixes it. Quote
Los_Control Posted Monday at 10:21 PM Author Report Posted Monday at 10:21 PM @oldodge41 .... just so you know, you just ruined my day. Here I am happily working on my 49 Dodge and you pop up with something that makes me pay attention ... I'm curious now about venting and wonder if it could be as simple as that? I can not monitor fuel pressure while driving. I never shared this photo, I just boxed it up and threw it on the shelf for future parts. This fuel pump is a few years old but has possibly 5K miles on it since I installed it. And it still creates the correct pressure for the car .... I had a rattle in the rear of the car and I was suspecting fuel issues so even though it only had 5K miles on it I changed it anyways. What would cause the body to crack like this? .... This was my strange rattle. It was not a cheap pump, I paid up for it to get a better pump ... I just wrote it off as a defect and I got suckered .... Is it possible that the vent is plugged and causing issues with the fuel system? I dunno, seems like I will not sleep tonight though unless I remove the gas cap and go for a drive Quote
Los_Control Posted Monday at 11:50 PM Author Report Posted Monday at 11:50 PM (edited) @oldodge41 Another swing and a miss .... it did not make a difference removing the gas cap .... it did make me think though. I do not know how the tank vents without getting under it and looking .... I assume removing the gas cap would be enough though. I think about the brake power booster had mud dobbers (bees) plugged up the vacuum line inside the canister and had no brakes ... or could not bleed the new brakes until after I found and cleared the blockage. I'm just grasping at straws at this point ... I wonder if it is possible a faulty brake power booster could cause run issues like I'm experiencing? I would expect it to cause a issue but would not come and go depending on speed driven .... But it is one item on the vehicle that is questionable. The brakes have worked exactly as expected, good solid pedal on the top ..... today on the way home while thinking about it ... pedal felt a wee little bit harder .... could just be my imagination while reaching for straws ... will watch it. The reason why I wonder is if bees could get into the vacuum line of power booster, could get into vent line of gas tank. Edited Monday at 11:53 PM by Los_Control Quote
JBNeal Posted Tuesday at 12:48 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 12:48 AM I believe there is a rollover valve on or near the fuel tank sending unit that acts as a vent...and bugs and dirt can plug those up. The plastic baffle crack could be age related. When I pulled the diesel tank on the QuadCab a couple of years ago, the strainer on the baffle was clogged, and when I tried to clean it, it began to disintegrate...that's 20+ yrs in a plastic diesel tank, and it still rotted; gasoline additives are a bit more aggressive on drying out plastics. How old is that oxygen sensor? Quote
Los_Control Posted Tuesday at 01:09 AM Author Report Posted Tuesday at 01:09 AM 7 minutes ago, JBNeal said: The plastic baffle crack could be age related. I replaced that fuel pump about 5K miles before removing it .... the pump is about 3-4 years old because I let the car sit for 2+ years before changing the motor for the 2nd time .... the crack is not age related. .... just early failure. 13 minutes ago, JBNeal said: I believe there is a rollover valve on or near the fuel tank sending unit that acts as a vent...and bugs and dirt can plug those up. That is something to check, the pump and lines have some proprietary connections on them and I remember there is a L shaped vent that comes out of the tank. There is a supply fuel line, a return line and then a vent line that comes out of the tank and is about 12" long and has a funny plastic cap on it ..... something I will have to take a closer look at. Quote
Sniper Posted Tuesday at 03:20 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 03:20 AM 2 hours ago, Los_Control said: then a vent line that comes out of the tank and is about 12" long and has a funny plastic cap on it ..... something I will have to take a closer look at. That line is so you can siphon the tank empty when you go to pull it. Quote
oldodge41 Posted Tuesday at 01:27 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 01:27 PM Sorry to cut in to your '49 time.😁 It was just a wild ass guess. I'll keep pondering on it. Like I could stop if I wanted to.😙 Issues like this intrigue me and I must say, you are much more patient than me. It's really hard to troubleshoot at 70 mph. Anyway, Merry Christmas, maybe Santa can fix it. Quote
Los_Control Posted Wednesday at 06:15 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 06:15 PM On 12/24/2024 at 7:27 AM, oldodge41 said: Sorry to cut in to your '49 time.😁 It was just a wild ass guess. I'll keep pondering on it. Like I could stop if I wanted to.😙 Issues like this intrigue me and I must say, you are much more patient than me. It's really hard to troubleshoot at 70 mph. Anyway, Merry Christmas, maybe Santa can fix it. I thank you for the suggestion, it was very plausible that it could be my issue. I do think it is something simple like that, since I have tried all the obvious things with no luck. I was just trying to inject a little humor into the situation .... I really am frustrated with the car at this point. I need a good laugh Next up will be to remove the plenum and go through all the wiring and checking grounds and vacuum routing. Not til after the new year though. .... I just need a break from it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.