aero3113 Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 I know this has been talked about but I never really got a sure answer.Is lead additive needed in a P-20.When I bought the car the guy told me that he did not use lead and when I rebuilt the engine most of the rings were broken but the valves looked good.Would the broken rings be caused by not using lead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Ed Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 No. The flatheads all had hardened valve seats right from the factory. Your broken rings are something else Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TodFitch Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 I know this has been talked about but I never really got a sure answer.Is lead additive needed in a P-20.When I bought the car the guy told me that he did not use lead and when I rebuilt the engine most of the rings were broken but the valves looked good.Would the broken rings be caused by not using lead? 1. Lead was added as a cheap way of increasing octane. 2. Lead fouled up engines badly. So lead scavengers were added too to keep the lead deposits down. 3. Apparently some residual lead helped in fighting exhaust valve seat recession in 1960s engines when they were driven long distances at high speeds/high loads. Those engines typically used the cast iron block/head for their valve seating. 4. You are unlikely to be pulling a heavy trailer for hours on end at 70 MPH in your P-20. 5. Your P-20 L-6 came with hardened exhaust valve seats from the factory. So even if you decide to haul your boat to the other end of the continent using your P-20 you are covered. Ergo, lead additive is not needed for your P-20. Near as I can tell, the usual cause of broken rings is age/wear in the engine and the rings hitting the wear ridge at the top of the cylinder. That is unrelated to lead in the gas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
central52 Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 I'm curious, too, about the lead additive question. Is it necessary to add it to today's modern gasoline. I have a 1947 Plymouth, and use 89 octane gas. Pepboys sell a lead additive bottle. Should I use it? Ed P. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Coatney Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 One can go to Pets-Are-Us and buy a diamond studded collar for there favorite dog. The dog could care less as the collar is not required and does nothing. But by using this collar the dogs owners boost there personal comfort level and it makes them feel good. One can go to Pep Boys and buy lead additive or most any other liquid additive for there favorite car engine. The car engine could care less as the additive is not required and does nothing. But by using these additives the car owners boost there personal comfort level and it makes them feel good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TodFitch Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 I'm curious, too, about the lead additive question. Is it necessary to add it to today's modern gasoline. I have a 1947 Plymouth, and use 89 octane gas. Pepboys sell a lead additive bottle. Should I use it? Ed P. See answer below from me or one above your post from Don. All Plymouth L-6 engines came from the factory with hardened exhaust valve seats. All the way back to 1933. Lead additive is not needed. Unless, of course, you like the lead fouling your spark plugs and the lead acids/salts gunking up your crankcase and eating out your bearings and exhaust system. Basically, lead has always been bad. But it was a cheap octane booster. If the lead scavangers (also bad) left a little lead behind that had a side effect of reducing valve seat recession on some engines under some driving conditions, it was bad for your car in so many other ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Neon Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 Tod- While I am no chemist, I am a trained biologist so I took over two years worth of chemistry in college. I even did two term papers on lead (General Chemistry and Ecology). I am fascinated by your statement about lead acids eating up bearings and other components. The only instance that I can point to any sort of a lead acid existing is plumbic acid which can only occur in a water-free (anhydrous) environment under very controlled conditions. That being said, this plumbic acid is very weak and given a choice I'll take plumbic acid over any of the other acidic compounds formed when unleaded gasoline is burnt in an internal combustion engine. Any lead compunds that could form would actually show lead to be a good guy as it reacts with sulfuric, hydrochloric, and other acids to form a non-corrosive salt that usually serves to protect valves and have lubricating properties similar to graphite. A typical reaction involving tetraethyl lead in an internal combustion engine forms white lead (PbO2). This is what serves to help protect valves and serve as a graphite-like dry lubricant. I will accept the argument that lead may be unnecessary, but to say that lead is detrimental to an engine that has its oil changed on a regular basis is a little hard for me to swallow. Lead may actually serve as an oil extender as it offers dry lubrication and neutralises acids formed in internal combustion. I'd be interested in your source of information about how leaded is more detrimental than unleaded gasoline when burnt in an internal combustion engine of pre-1975 vintage. The only mechanical reasons I have ever heard for removing lead from gasoline is that it caused deposits in poorly maintained engines (long oil change intervals) and damage to catalytic converters. The air pollution argument is bogus as lead particulate from cars usually settled rapidly on to the pavement or gravel road. Unless your kids are out licking the road, lead in gasoline is the least of your worries. Please elaborate on how lead is some how bad for old cars. I seem to remember lead (actually plumbous and plumbic oxides, red and white lead) being recommended in the Plymouth service manuals to serve as a dry lubricant on moving components. Unnecessary, perhaps. Detrimental, hardly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Skinner Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 How boot dat? I,m all for Diamond Studded Collars and Lead Additives then! I even grind up Chelated Zinc Tablets and throw some in my New Oil at an Oil and Filter Change. Use about 200mg. every Oil change and it feels sooooooo goooood. Doc says it Keeps the Prostate flowin to. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Neon Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 Perhaps the lead in the gasoline doesn't matter and I am just wasting my money. Perhaps the zinc in the oil doesn't matter and I am just wasting my money buying diesel oil. It doesn't hurt anything and that's my point. When some one tries to tell me lead is bad for my engine, I expect them to prove it. I explained my limited scientific and chemical understanding. Now you show me your information. I expect to be driving for another 50 years and to be around 70 more years. I want my P15 to be there then so the grand nephews can drive me around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TodFitch Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 No chemist either... And I don't remember the exact source for my broad statement. But the first area that comes to mind are from the Gasoline FAQ at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part1/index.html Originally, iodine was the best antiknock available, but was not a practicalgasoline additive, and was used as the benchmark. In 1919 aniline was found to have superior antiknock ability to iodine, but also was not a practical additive, however aniline became the benchmark antiknock, and various compounds were compared to it. The discovery of tetra ethyl lead, and the scavengers required to remove it from the engine were made by teams lead by Thomas Midgley Jr. in 1922 [9,10,24]. They tried selenium oxychloride which was an excellent antiknock, however it reacted with iron and "dissolved" the engine. Midgley was able to predict that other organometallics would work, and slowly focused on organoleads. They then had to remove the lead, which would otherwise accumulate and coat the engine and exhaust system with lead. They discovered and developed the halogenated lead scavengers that are still used in leaded fuels. The scavengers, ( ethylene dibromide and ethylene dichloride ), function by providing halogen atoms that react with the lead to form volatile lead halide salts that can escape out the exhaust. The quantity of scavengers added to the alkyl lead concentrate is calculated according to the amount of lead present. If sufficient scavenger is added to theoretically react with all the lead present, the amount is called one "theory". Typically, 1.0 to 1.5 theories are used, but aviation gasolines must only use one theory. This ensures there is no excess bromine that could react with the engine. So I think I "remembered" that the problem with bearings and such was due to lead when perhaps it was due to the lead scavangers. If aircraft engines are not allowed to have more than "one theory" of scavenger whilst auto gasoline had between 1.0 and 1.5 "theories" then it could be excess bromines that are the issue. My personal experience is that spark plugs and exhaust systems last longer with unleaded fuel. Since I have always changed oil at short mileages I have not no been affected by lead deposits in the pan and engine (other than when I first got an old car in the era of leaded gas and typically found a bunch of grey/black colored muck in the engine). In any case, I know a chemist who has an interest in lead, I guess I should consult with them before I make any more broad statements on this topic... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
central52 Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 My head is spinning reading all that technical stuff about lead additives for our old cars. Seems to be a standoff. So, to use lead additive, or not to use lead additive. Ayyie, that is the question. What's the consensus out there? Who uses lead additives, who doesn't? Ed P. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james curl Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 Why? The engines in MoPar cars came with hardened exhaust seats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny S Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 Doesn't seem like a stand off from my perspective. You DON'T NEED lead additives in our vintage flathead motors. You are wasting money if you use them in our engines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Saraceno Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 So wait a minute... Let me get this straight.... Do I need to buy a diamond studded collar for my flathead engine? I'm sorry, I'll go back to sleep now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Coatney Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 So wait a minute... Let me get this straight....Do I need to buy a diamond studded collar for my flathead engine? I'm sorry, I'll go back to sleep now. Jim; The diamond studded collar will work for your engine only if it makes you feel good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric wissing Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 Why? The engines in MoPar cars came with hardened exhaust seats. I like visiting another Chrysler site and they had a discussion on hardened seats. A retired Chrysler engineer chimed in that they stopped doing this sometime in the 50s? because of cost. Anyone here know this? The other site is an Imperial newsletter and is a real pain compared to this one. You have to subscribe through Yahoo and I can not respond or post because I am stupid!! Eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobT-47P15 Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 OK....now, for a sim-u-lar but differnt qwestion......how about the use of Marvel Mystery Oil in gas tank and/or the crankcase???? As the judge told the jury, "what say you"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Coatney Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 OK....now, for a sim-u-lar but differnt qwestion......how about the use ofMarvel Mystery Oil in gas tank and/or the crankcase???? As the judge told the jury, "what say you"? Bob; If it makes you feel good use it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobT-47P15 Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 I figure it may not help, but it probably can't hurt to use it. A little extra lubrication from time to time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Neon Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 I like visiting another Chrysler site and they had a discussion on hardened seats. A retired Chrysler engineer chimed in that they stopped doing this sometime in the 50s? because of cost. Eric My engine came out of a 1956 Dodge and this is why I use lead additive. I thought I had read this some where as well, but I didn't have any reference. I'm not about to tear my engine open just for a look-see. Bob, I add 8 oz. of ATF to my gasoline at every fill-up for additional top cylinder lubrication. MMO would probably work even better. When I lived in Minnesota, I used to run about a pt. of MMO through my carburetor and stalled out the engine right before I covered her up for a long winter's nap. Smokes like a demon when starting up again in the spring, but it dissipates as the oil burns off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TodFitch Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 My engine came out of a 1956 Dodge and this is why I use lead additive. I thought I had read this some where as well, but I didn't have any reference. I'm not about to tear my engine open just for a look-see.Bob, I add 8 oz. of ATF to my gasoline at every fill-up for additional top cylinder lubrication. MMO would probably work even better. When I lived in Minnesota, I used to run about a pt. of MMO through my carburetor and stalled out the engine right before I covered her up for a long winter's nap. Smokes like a demon when starting up again in the spring, but it dissipates as the oil burns off. My understanding, probably wrong, is that the L-6 engine always had the hardened exhaust valve seats. I believe that the engines designed and introduced in the 1950s and 60s did not have that feature (V-8 engines and the slant 6). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Saraceno Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 A retired Chrysler engineer chimed in that they stopped doing this sometime in the 50s? because of cost. Anyone here know this? I have a '55 engine and a '57 engine. They both have hardened valve inserts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancer Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 So, would my 53 Desoto Hemi have hardened seats? Anyone know? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T120 Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 ...Does Royal Triton nead a lead additive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andydodge Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Don........If I learnt to bark would you buy me a diamond studded lead collar?............woof woof.........lol...........made me laugh, thanks, andyd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.