Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So is that actually a 2 stroke motor?  I remember that some of the radial engine planes in WWI had cylinders that revolved about the crank, with one non adjustable carburetor feeding a central intake port.  They were basically full throttle or off.  For decreasing speed during landing they would be controlled by turning the spark off and on.  Did this for taxiing also. Those planes were notorious for dumping newbie pilots that did not account for the rotational torque.  they would also dive like a banshee to one side and wallow like a pig in deep mud trying to turn the other way

Posted

Very interesting. No need for a flywheel and watch where you put your hands! Nothing new in the automotive world, only refinements.

Posted

Some of those WW1 aeroplanes could turn off cylinders ( ground out) to control speed and power otherwise they were 'WOT' as Greg said.

Anyone that has the opportunity to visit The Rhinebeck Aerodrome should do so. During the summer months of course. Well worth the visit for the airshow as well as all of the static displays.

Posted

No need for fuel injection or pump....gravity flow downward and then atomizted gas is thown out to the chambers via the external channels....nice!

 

48D

Posted

Ooooh....good point.

Guess its just a Shaft, surrounded by crank rods. lol

 

48D

Posted

I see your observation..as in the ceiling fan idea...this crank is acting as a rotor and the pistons as a stator....but the crankshaft still performs its function though locked in a stationary position do to the very reciprocal action of the rod as the cylinder revolve about the lets say offset axis....it is that the whole idea of the rotating crank in convention makes this appear so abstract..personally I see this as one huge gyro...I would guess this was one massive exercise in balancing the rotating assembly..say you parked it for a week and some mud dobbers built their mud nests in the cooling fins of one cylinder..kinda like comparing chopsticks to the modern fork..both will get you fed..but one does have a distinct advantage over the other..and I bet some folks will opt for the chopsticks..

Posted

. . . kinda like comparing chopsticks to the modern fork..both will get you fed..but one does have a distinct advantage over the other..and I bet some folks will opt for the chopsticks..

World wide I am guessing the number of chopstick users is as large or larger than fork users.

 

Stationary crank shaft is an oxymoron.

Its all relative. From the frame of reference of the cylinder, the crank (and car and world) are revolving and it is stationary.

Posted

kinda like comparing chopsticks to the modern fork..both will get you fed..but one does have a distinct advantage over the other..and I bet some folks will opt for the chopsticks..

Ever try and eat Jello with chop sticks :D

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Terms of Use