Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 237 engine and I'm wondering if a 201 crankshaft will fit? Im wanting to do a short stroke big bore combo.

I keep doing web searches for questions and the web keeps leading me to the answers here, so I must be in the right place. Thanks everybody for all the answered questions.

 

Posted (edited)

Are both engines the same length??  In the US made engines the 201 has a 23 inch block and the 237 was the longer Chrysler DeSoto version .  So cranks would not interchange, north of the border they might be the same block length and might interchange so more info is needed.

Edited by greg g
Posted

Hmmm, bummer. Do you know of any other cranks that have a smaller stroke than 4-1/4 that will fit in a 25" long block?

Posted (edited)
On 4/9/2021 at 5:38 PM, Plymouthy Adams said:

journals are smaller

Other than the journals being smaller are there any other differences that you know of?

And when you say "journals" which ones are you referring to, the rods, the bearings, or both?

Edited by RobertM
Posted (edited)

The 201 engine is a pretty mild engine . The crank would be a weak point.  I don't think I'd want a 201 crank in a 3 7/16 bore 237 engine. I'm imagining the 201 crank not lasting long with a 237 bore engine.

 

FYI the 201 engine is 3 ⅛ bore x 4 ⅜ stroke.  237 ci engine is 3 7/16 x 4 ¼" stroke,

 

 

Edited by keithb7
Posted (edited)

Seen here is a 201 (23" long block) crank beside a 237 (25" long block) crank.

 

Screen Shot 2021-04-10 at 10.08.47 PM.png

Edited by keithb7
  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the pic. All the info I can gather helps.

The only reason I'm looking at the 201 is its the shortest stroke I could find. Here are the numbers I found on the web. Bore 3-3/8 x Stroke 3-3/4. The stroke would be reduced by .5 of an inch. To me thats worth investigating.

By shortening the stroke it reduces stress on all the parts. I would have rods made and choose a flat top piston to go with it. Then I'd work on getting the engine to breathe.

The size of the rod journals won't matter if I have rods built, but if the main journals are different it could be expensive to adjust that.

thumbnail_20210411_042250.jpg

Posted
9 hours ago, RobertM said:

Other than the journals being smaller are there any other differences that you know of?

And when you say "journals" which ones are you referring to, the rods, the bearings, or both?

Parts book shows that both the rod and main bearings changed when they went from the 201 to the 218.

Posted

Found someone local that can weld and grind the main bearing journals. I just have to find a 25" crankshaft with the 3-3/4 stroke. If anybody has one please send me a message.

I have an engine dyno to test all the changes. Although it might be some time before I get to the engine I can post the results if anybody is interested.

My main focus right now is building the frame, drivetrain and body which I've already made a lot of progress on, then the engine will get built. The vehicle is a 46 Power Wagon.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Terms of Use