Uncle-Pekka Posted February 21, 2010 Report Posted February 21, 2010 I would also guess 1954 like Don C. Anyway, the sedan in the 2nd row, 2nd car from right to left. Is that a Kaiser or what? Quote
randroid Posted February 21, 2010 Report Posted February 21, 2010 Folks, I'd say more like '51 because those are used cars and the Studebaker in the second row has a late 40's air to it. All just conjecture on my part. -Randy Quote
Plymouthy Adams Posted February 21, 2010 Report Posted February 21, 2010 Randy..look closer at the Plymouth under the name Smith on the sign.. Quote
Uncle-Pekka Posted February 21, 2010 Report Posted February 21, 2010 Yes, exactly - I also based my assumption on the very same Plymouth 2D. Of course it could be any year after '54, but there are several same color pickup trucks in the back row, which could be new at the time... Therefore I would not guess, say, 1959... However, Ahem, I kind of asked for conversation over the Kaiser... Here in North Europe Kaiser seems to be the most long gone of all dead marquees. Very few left, very few people know or appreciate them. On top of all they had assembly lines in Holland and Israel, resulting vague reputation. "not really an american car". The henry J's made in Haifa Israel were all crap - at least that's what my father & all other senior craftsmen been telling me. On the other hand the fifties Kaiser Manhattans are really good looking cars. Also nice interiors - I wonder are they after all so bad? Quote
randroid Posted February 21, 2010 Report Posted February 21, 2010 Uncle-Pekka, Even in the early 60's Kaisers were getting scarce in California. I knew a few families that would drive nothing else, one of them had two for driving and one for parts. The story behind them was they were too advanced for their time, like Studebaker and Tucker, but I haven't heard anything else about them in almost fifty years. -Randy Quote
greg g Posted February 21, 2010 Author Report Posted February 21, 2010 Kaisers kinda shot their bolt when they wanted to be compared to Cadillac in quality. They kept thier contenental 6 but put a paxton supercharger on it, but in the minds of Americans all "quality cars" had v8's. they certainly went upscale with split bamboo accents in the Manhattan Dragon, but after 50/51, assembly quality and low inventory due to metal shortages fromt he Korean war left Kaiser Frazer and Hudson, Packard, ad several other low volume brands in deep financial trouble from wich they never recovered. There are several around here that show up from time to time at shows and cruise ins. Always interesting to look at, but not real popular here either. Quote
Reg Evans Posted February 21, 2010 Report Posted February 21, 2010 Judging from all the Dodge trucks with the split windshields and that Plymouth under the Smith sign I would say it's 1953. In 1954 the Dodge trucks went to a 1 piece windshield. Quote
BobT-47P15 Posted February 21, 2010 Report Posted February 21, 2010 That looks like maybe a 1950 Kaiser judging by the triangular chrome item on the front of the hood........ Quote
B-Watson Posted February 22, 2010 Report Posted February 22, 2010 That looks like maybe a 1950 Kaiser judging by the triangular chrome itemon the front of the hood........ That's actually a 1951 Frazer. The green convertible is a Manhatten model while the one in the old photo is a base sedan. I wouldn't put the photo any earlier than the fall of 1952. Note the new looking 1953 Plymouth club coupe with the wide whites and Dodge sedan under the "Dodge Plymouth" dealer sign. Bill Vancouver, BC Quote
greg g Posted February 22, 2010 Author Report Posted February 22, 2010 Remember this is the used car lot, new cars were at the main dealership. Quote
greg g Posted February 22, 2010 Author Report Posted February 22, 2010 looks like the inventory turns over pretty good at Munson's used car lot Quote
pflaming Posted February 22, 2010 Report Posted February 22, 2010 Referencing picture #1 there is a 38+/- "Plymouth". IF that is a '54 picture that car was 16 years old when the picture was taken. Probably had about the same engine as the '53. Is that a fair statement? Quote
Englishbob Posted February 22, 2010 Report Posted February 22, 2010 1958--no reason just the year I was born:D Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.