rb1949

We're here with 50-60-70 year old cars. Some are just old, some considered classics, and some in the category of collectible. All are enjoyed. Any preference to your needs, seeking out something that may be more preferred than another? The old car market is changing under the new generations.There are cars from the 50's, 60's and 70's that have become desirable. How do you know which ones at the time? So lets jump ahead to today, with personal speculation. Are there any modern cars that you feel may be in a "most wanted" category 50-60 years from now? Will your future great-grandkid be bragging that his dad actually owns a 2016 Charger (or whatever)? Will there even be gasoline powered cars? We can't predict the future, but can have fun thinking about it.

Treat your eyes and go with stainless.

He's on the way with a check.

Is your color for 1955 on this color chart? http://www.autocolorlibrary.com/aclchip.aspx?image=1955-Plymouth-pg01.jpg

My '49 springs looks like they are wrapped in some kind of rubber(?) Never checked close.

but where is it? (you'll see the photo in the small box down there, before you hit submit)

You've got the photo. Next time you post, look toward the bottom where it says "Choose File", click it. Find the pix on your computer and click OK. It will be attached to the post.

Yup, my '49 is wired to blink map lite, but doesn't work at the moment. Lamp OK, never checked the switch. 1/2 dumb as it's useless in daytime. You didn't provide clues to year, make, model, tranny for your needs.

Have a new external band for 41-54 Dodge Chy DeSoto with Fluid Drive. PM if that's it.

What's to restore? Very nice, go drive.

Just to clarify one more time, so no one is misled by what you see in the pictures. Painting did improve the red cosmetic appearance of the lenses. It does NOT solve the crazing issue. The crazing cracks are still there, and visible.

Thanks. The jalopy needs all the help it can get. Let's add one more for those who may be curious and tempted to ask. The car is backed into a small dark garage. Best I could do with a picture of the lens illuminated.

Now that this project is done, I can express personal opinions of using the paint on tail lenses, both Testors products. Each had only 2 light coats. They were painted on the outside, not the inside. I honestly like the finish of the brush on better than the spray. It is very very thin and flows smooth. The aerosol, however, seemed to have a slightly more tail light Red than the brush on. Both are Transparent but have different names for the Red color. As it goes, the brush on bottle is not available in a spray, and the aerosol is not available in a bottle. I am satisfied with the improved cosmetic appearance of the lenses, both day and night. So far so good. But the test has just begun. They look good newly refreshed. The test of time will now determine the durability of this effort. Will it hold up to the elements and heat of the bulb, and for how long. The picture lets you see both left and right together, brush and spray. Can you tell any difference?

No bench testing prior to dismantle to evaluate possible external problems?

At least change the tranny fluid, it's only 3 pints. With incorrect components it should still work with electrics disconnected. No paper manual? Hit the Imperial Club website for 2 good manuals on the M6. Print them if you want. How to test the governor & solenoid. Process of elimination one step at a time.

Chop Chop, time's up. Now you can take a look at the LEFT side tail light refresh. This one was done using the aerosol spray mentioned, the can I got cheap at Hobby Lobby if you've been reading. They are a definite improvement for daytime viewing, And do glow a nice Red at night. Do remember, this process will NOT resolve the crazing issue.

Doctor, as eluded to above, the CORRECT reflector for your model year seems to have been White, not Red. Glad you're happy. How about a photo? And the particular paint in question has been stated several times.

OK, old and faded. I know the feeling. Yes, illuminating shows red, because there is red on the inside. No rocket science there. Similar to those who paint the OUTSIDE of an Amber turn lens Red.When lit, it still glows Amber. 1500 wet sand, same as the first one pictured on the car that was brush painted. No, putting water on it does not turn red, only shiny white. Update later.

This project has brought up some confusion. I was lucky enough to have an extra set of lenses. Observation indicated that this set had indeed been painted at one time, probably trying to hide the crazing. No problem to sand them down smooth to prepare for my painting. Sanding took off the paint easily, but revealed that these lenses are a milky white plastic, not red(??) My original lenses are red plastic. Why are identical lenses different? Did they change the process in how they were made? This style is specific to '49 only. The picture shows the difference. Any explanations?

Great looking in the pix, not even a for sale sign. A good deal joining your collection.

You missed the post/pix started in 2012.

Clever upgrades. Some of these beds look better than the truck.

Shop around for that #1605 can. Amazon is better than ebay. Amazon reviews reference tail light coating. Hobby Lobby has it, but does not offer free ship to store pickup. Will call and see if they stock it. If so, the best deal @ $4.99, plus use their 40% off weekly coupon (print from website). Good luck refreshing your tail lenses. EDIT: don't call Hobby, they have no way to check if an item is in stock(?) So off to the store. Success, on the shelf. Great coupon brought the price down to $2.99. My kind of shopping. Print coupons and buy more if needed, but doubtful. Anxious to compare this 1605 spray to the 4630 brush on I used, seen in the above photo. Update when ready.

Wow lwebb, great lenses and color. 100% better than old crazed ones. I compliment your effort and finished product. Only you could determine a price compared to buying NOS, if available. Keep up the good work on all your projects.