Dunkin Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 Howdy, I am looking to replace all six tires on my 1947 - WHA48 two ton Dodge with new ones and I wanted to know if anyone thought that instead of installing 8.25x20 all the way around I might look at installing 7.25's on my steer axle. I have my build out sheet which seems to show 8.25's all the way around, although it reads 7" below the tire size. Thanks, Roman 1947 WHA48 Quote
Robert Harrison Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 I show several versions of the WHA-48 from the factory Salesman's book shows two Tire sizes for the front both on 7 inch rims. A 7.50 8 ply or a 8.25 10 ply. Both on 7 inch rims. It shows the same for the rears. If you see a code 130 13000 MGVW on your build sheet it came with 7.50 if you see a code 155 MGVW it came with 8.25. both on 7 inch rims. Unless you plan to run a lot of weight I would go with the 7.50 inch front steering would be easier. It looks like the tire size and rear springs were the major differences. Bob Harrison 1 Quote
Brent B3B Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 Not the same year but, my B3GA has 7.50 up front and 8.25 on the rear and I agree, i think it steers a little easier without a load than my B3HH that has 8.25 all around. 1 Quote
wallytoo Posted February 17 Report Posted February 17 i have no idea how the 7.50s would be. my b1fa has 8.25x20s front and rear. never really thought it steered hard, though. 1 Quote
Dunkin Posted February 17 Author Report Posted February 17 23 hours ago, Robert Harrison said: I show several versions of the WHA-48 from the factory Salesman's book shows two Tire sizes for the front both on 7 inch rims. A 7.50 8 ply or a 8.25 10 ply. Both on 7 inch rims. It shows the same for the rears. If you see a code 130 13000 MGVW on your build sheet it came with 7.50 if you see a code 155 MGVW it came with 8.25. both on 7 inch rims. Unless you plan to run a lot of weight I would go with the 7.50 inch front steering would be easier. It looks like the tire size and rear springs were the major differences. Bob Harrison Thanks Robert. I looked at the record and it doesn't show neither of the codes you speak of unfortunately. Quote
Dunkin Posted February 29 Author Report Posted February 29 Howdy, I have somewhat of an understanding how to measure the width of a wheel (without mounted tire) by measuring from where the bead of the tire goes from one side to the other. My issue is that the wheels on my 2 ton Dodge don't conform to the same shape as wheels I am accustomed to. I wanted to ensure that my wheels are 7". I know 8.25x20 will work as they are on the truck all the way around, but I wanted to ensure that 7.5x20 would work on the drive wheels. Is it safe to say that if 8.25's are on my drive wheels currently, 7.5 would work for sure? Thanks, Roman Quote
9 foot box Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 I have two 6 hole 20” wheels that I removed the old tires. I set the ring on one, and it measured 5”. There is a number on the face of the wheel, that may help. I don’t know if you have 5 or 6 hole wheels. Rick D. Quote
Dunkin Posted March 4 Author Report Posted March 4 Thanks Rick. I have a 5 bolt set up on my rig. Looking at the first first photo, it looks as though I could use a 7.5 on the front. The single vs. dual confuses me a bit though. I would hate for it not to work, so I think I am just gonna go with 8.25's all the way around as I know those are good on my rig. Roman Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.