Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I’m Interested in learning why they may have changed up the cam timing gears width and chain. 
 

Left is 1953 Canadian 25” long 228 ci engine. Dodge. 
 

Right is 1949 Canadian 25” long 218 ci engine. Dodge. 
 

Although the gears are the same OD and pitch, the chains are not interchangeable.  The double row gear is slightly wider.  Forgot to mic them to compare. Wondering why they changed this up? From wider In 49 to narrower in 53 in my examples. 
 

 

8E787D1B-CDEA-4751-9AD4-A7159640D210.jpeg

Edited by keithb7
Posted

If I can guess, was wide chain creates more friction even though it can carry a higher peak load.

On the cars I used to work on they went from single row (bicycle type) cam chain to double row then back to single row.

The double row chains were the only ones I ever needed to change. They went through guide plates, tensioners and the chains themselves.

From that experience I'd say the narrower chains are more desirable.

Of course if you could use a gear drive, well then there's nothing to worry about. But then that's a whole other set of issues. 

289B0385-870D-46E9-B482-3244678EADD5_1_201_a.jpeg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Terms of Use