Dale Uhrich Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 I was wondering if most poeple run the vaccum advance or not. which motors had it and if it's better or not. I have motors both ways. Quote
grey beard Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Dale, My son in Montana has five 1 1/2-2-ton B series Dodges, none of which have vac advance units. Parts book says up to one ton but I know there are exceptions to that out there running around. Based on how poorly these engines run with the vac advance not working properly, I must say that the centrifugal advance curve on the non-vac advance distribuors must be much different than those with. In other words, a distributor with the vac advance unhooked will work much differently than one not made for a vac advance. Any thoughts on this? Sure would be fun to try both distributors in a known engine and see how the performance compares. If any of you have experience along these lines, please fess up and share your wisdom with this pilgrim. Thanks Quote
pflaming Posted December 9, 2008 Report Posted December 9, 2008 Assuming a spark advance is beneficial on hill pull, the a vacuum advance may not have been used in flat land areas, such as parts of montana, etc. OR in a large truck with a two speed axle, the different gears may have, in effect served the same purpose as a vacuum advance which was a 'temporary' / automatic " down shift to climb a hill. All this is purely conjecture or 'food for thought'. A friend and I were asking the same question last week. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.