Booker T Posted January 10, 2011 Report Posted January 10, 2011 (edited) Anyone know what CFM the original Carter 1 bbl was? I have the Carter / Webber 2bbl setup from Langdons currently but have been thinking about running some other carbs. I have some Holly 1904's sitting around and also some 97 cores. I think the 97's run at 150 cfm and have no idea about the 1904's. The 1904's are the ones that sometimes came with the "visi-bowl" / glass bowl (the ones I have don't). I believe they were an IH truck carb...maybe some Fords too. I used the calculator in the link below for suggested CFM. The formula seems to be affected quite a bit by the "Maximum Safe Engine RPM". Based on 85% efficiency and 230 CI the suggested CFM jumps from around 200 to 250 when the RPM figure is changed from 3500 to 4500. I have never run a tach on this car, but what do you think would be a good figure to use in this formula? http://www.4secondsflat.com/Carb_CFM_Calculator.html Edited January 10, 2011 by Booker T forgot to put link in post Quote
Barabbas Posted January 10, 2011 Report Posted January 10, 2011 Booker, The 230 has max HP at 3600 and "red line" of about 4000-4200; which calculates to 230 cfm Mike (aka The MGs) Quote
Booker T Posted January 11, 2011 Author Report Posted January 11, 2011 Looks like a couple of 97's would be a case of "over-carbing"...since they would be around 300 CFM... Thanks! Brooks Quote
Barabbas Posted January 11, 2011 Report Posted January 11, 2011 Booker, if you read through some of the past threads on the forum you will probably find that the most popular carb set-up here is either two of the original Ball&Ball carbs or Dual webbers from Langdon. When it was time for me to decide I saw the same equation you did and finally decided on the dual B&B set-up--check out this post: http://www430.pair.com/p15d24/mopar_forum/showthread.php?t=20053 Quote
bob westphal Posted January 11, 2011 Report Posted January 11, 2011 Dual 97s work well if you install a hot cam, go for a larger bore, do some porting, and up the compression. I had this set up using an Edmunds water heated manifold. It worked very well. If your going to stay stock, the dual singles work fine with maybe smaller jets. Bob Quote
Booker T Posted January 11, 2011 Author Report Posted January 11, 2011 The 230 is at the machine shop now being rebuilt. I think they are going to take .50 off the head. I have a "mild" cam ready to go in it also. Right now I have the Langdons setup and the offy dual intake. I am also running the Langdon dual exhaust manifolds. I may just leave well enough alone...it was running relatively good before I took the engine out...well, relatively good considering it had 2 broken rings! The problem is that I always have trouble leaving well enough alone. My latest instance of this was to start polishing my intake...got just far enough along to realize what a pain it is...and to realize that I was far enough along that i have to finish it! Quote
Booker T Posted January 11, 2011 Author Report Posted January 11, 2011 Booker, if you read through some of the past threads on the forum you will probably find that the most popular carb set-up here is either two of the original Ball&Ball carbs or Dual webbers from Langdon. When it was time for me to decide I saw the same equation you did and finally decided on the dual B&B set-up--check out this post: http://www430.pair.com/p15d24/mopar_forum/showthread.php?t=20053 Hmmm...now I have something else to consider...the 3X1 Asche setup! Part of the reason I was considering changing out the Langdon setup I have now is to be a little different. My best bet is to get the thing running good with what I have and then move to something else if the bug is still there! Quote
Big_John Posted January 11, 2011 Report Posted January 11, 2011 Anyone know what CFM the original Carter 1 bbl was? I have the Carter / Webber 2bbl setup from Langdons currently but have been thinking about running some other carbs. I have some Holly 1904's sitting around and also some 97 cores. I think the 97's run at 150 cfm and have no idea about the 1904's. The 1904's are the ones that sometimes came with the "visi-bowl" / glass bowl (the ones I have don't). I believe they were an IH truck carb...maybe some Fords too. I used the calculator in the link below for suggested CFM. The formula seems to be affected quite a bit by the "Maximum Safe Engine RPM". Based on 85% efficiency and 230 CI the suggested CFM jumps from around 200 to 250 when the RPM figure is changed from 3500 to 4500. I have never run a tach on this car, but what do you think would be a good figure to use in this formula? http://www.4secondsflat.com/Carb_CFM_Calculator.html Keep in mind that 2 bbl carbs are rated using 3.0 inHg pressure drop and 4 bbl carbs are rated using 1.5 inHg pressure drop. I'll bet that forumula is for 4bbl carbs. There's a formula to convert, I had to look it up. Divide the 2bbl rating by 1.414 to equal 4bbl rating. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.