Jump to content

Shock Absorber Replacements for Express Models


JBNeal
Go to solution Solved by JBNeal,

Recommended Posts

While doing some research, I found gaps in information for shock absorber replacements on the B-series.  Back when we had a local auto parts store that used actual parts books, I was able to get replacement shocks for my B-1s that matched my originals, so I had some crossover information to start with.  Monroe and Gabriel have useful yet incomplete websites for older models, so I was able to verify the technical specifications listed to the parts I had on hand.

 

Since I purchased those shocks years ago, I have acquired several B-3 and B-4 models (though one of the B-4s was stolen by some scrap iron banditos who also cleaned out a small barn full of spare parts, even the copper wire in the bldg).  These trucks have rusty shocks on them that I was not able to locate a complete part number, but I was able to verify something I spotted in the parts manual regarding different part numbers for the shock mounts:  B-1 and B-2 models have 5/8" mounts; B-3 and B-4 models have 11/16" mounts...

 

The parts manual goes into great detail about getting replacement parts for the shock absorber assembly, but these pages of part numbers are obsolete as I am unaware of anyone economically selling these parts, since the bulk of shock absorber sales are for the non-serviceable assembly.  In studying the parts manual, there were several part numbers listed for different applications, but I was able to glean some useful information coupled with the aforementioned crossover info.  For B-1 and B-2 models, the Monroe 31000 shocks fit the front axle, and the Monroe 32207 fits the rear axle, for 1/2-, 3/4- and 1-ton models.  But the B-3 and B-4 shocks have a different part number for 1/2- and 3/4-ton models, and the parts manual lists the quantity for front and rear axles.  So from a cost savings standpoint, Dodge chose one shock instead of two, since the previous front and rear shock specs were very close.  And even more perplexing, none of the parts manuals I have list a shock absorber part number for B-3-D or B-4-D models.  So judging from the consistency in the overall suspension designs from '48-'53, I am assuming that the 1 tons all use the same shock absorbers, as required...while eye-ballling my '51 dually, it has no rear shock absorbers nor any mounting brackets nor studs to install them...something that isn't spelled out in the parts manual (that I could find)...

 

So doing some digging around on the internets and putting my sleuthing skills to use, I was able to locate by the specifications listed to verify the part numbers missing in the factory parts manual.

For B-3 and B-4 1/2-, 3/4- and 1-ton models (front and rear):

 

Mopar 1321268 --  Monroe 66858  -- Gabriel 82065

 

Monroe does not list the B-series as an application for their p#; Gabriel sorta does...both are more economically priced than some of the items listed around the internet as "rare parts"...


All told, I reckon I spent about 3 hours looking at physical parts and scanning online information, most of this while watching the Chiefs-Titans game, after having this research project on the backburner for over 8 years...but now I can move forward with my projects, and others can service their projects accordingly :cool:

Edited by JBNeal
updated info
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I recall, I have Gabriel shocks on my truck. I got them from Auto Zone about 12 years ago. They had them listed on their web site, and even had the fronts in stock at my local store. The rear set was ordered in and I had them a day or two later. 

It even shocked the kid behind the counter when I asked him for shocks for a 1950 Dodge truck. His first reaction was, ”We won’t have anything for that.” I encouraged him to go ahead and look them up. (I already knew they were listed in their system) “WOW, we even have the fronts in stock!” Was his next comment. “I can have the rears here tomorrow.” ?

 

I don’t have the P/N’s anymore, and the Auto Zone web site no longer lists them, but they were different numbers for the fronts and rears on my 3/4 ton truck. 

Edited by Merle Coggins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Solution

I dug up the shock absorbers that I pulled off of the '49 1-ton to study them a little more, as they appeared original with the DPCD logo stamped into the dirt shield.  I was able to get the p#s off of them and critical dimensions:

  • F  --  1261982  --  12.38  --  20.25
  • R  --  1196294  --  11.75  --  18.75

I could not find neither of these p#s in the parts book nor could I find any reference to them online, so I'm not sure if these were original to the truck or if the p# I'm looking at on the dirt shield is referencing something else...these dims compare very close to the dims of the 31000 & 32207 shocks that I've been using for years from Monroe, which were listed as replacements in their interchange book back in the 90s.

 

So I did some studying of the parts manual and Monroe's Instruction Guide, as well as Gabriel's Online Catalog (which took some digging to find), and found some more part replacement numbers that could be used.  Some shocks are more available than others, and some shocks are cheaper than others, but after putting a few more hours into researching this topic, I think we have more options available for builds and restorations.

 

One thing I noticed in the parts manual is the specification of 1" domestic and 1-3/8" heavy duty export.  Looking at the shocks available, the common spec for passenger cars is 1-3/16" bore, with light truck shocks having a 1-3/8" bore.  I switched to a large bore shock on The Blue Bomber years ago, and it produced a slightly bouncy ride unladen but under a heavy load or pulling a trailer, the truck rode nice and smooth, and braking was much more controlled, with noticeably less nose dive.  So if you are just going to use your old buggy for commuting, then the 1-3/16" shocks should work fine, as they are a stronger design than the originals...if you plan on carrying a load on a regular basis, then the bigger shocks are a good investment.  I know when I was hauling water with both my '48 1/2 ton and '49 1-ton, I noticed after a few years that the replacement shocks (1-3/16" bore) were all leaking as I was really loading up the suspension but not moving in a hurry on any trip nor traveling tens of thousands of miles annually.

 

B-1-B, -C, -D

B-2-B, -C, -D

B-3-B, -C, -D

B-4-B, -C, -D

The Monroe and Gabriel shocks are not exactly the same in extended and collapsed dimensions, but they are generally within 1/4" of each other.  The best way I can explain this is that the Pilot-House trucks have a certain suspension travel, as do other makes & models that have similar geometry, and the manufacturers make shocks that fall within a certain range within that travel, so several different shocks could possibly fit a certain suspension geometry and still work.  I would favor a shock that allows the spring to hit its bumpstop so that the shock is not bearing a severe load...conversely, a shock should still have some stroke left when the springs have reached max vertical travel so that the tires are not being lifted off of the ground prematurely, enabling more control of the vehicle in extreme situations.

 

Obviously, the B-3 and B-4 shocks that are available now are more limited...just looking at the applications online, that 11/16" mounting diameter does not appear to be an industry standard as the 5/8" and 3/4" mounting diameters have been used on many shock configurations over the years.  I would list the different colors that these shocks are coated, but some of the factory descriptions do not match the pictures on their websites...also, some vendors had different colors listed from the factory website, so I reckon ya get what you get in the box :cool:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JBNeal said:

......Obviously, the B-3 and B-4 shocks that are available now are more limited...just looking at the applications online, that 11/16" mounting diameter does not appear to be an industry standard as the 5/8" and 3/4" mounting diameters have been used on many shock configurations over the years.  I would list the different colors that these shocks are coated, but some of the factory descriptions do not match the pictures on their websites...also, some vendors had different colors listed from the factory website, so I reckon ya get what you get in the box :cool:

 

In my searches the 11/16" diameter was always the show stopper.  Thanks for doing all this leg work.  

 

As for colors, I bought some Monroe 66858 shocks off of ebay and they were bright yellow.  Since I could only get two good ones off of ebay I bought two more from Amazon and they were gloss black!  Now  I have to decide which pair to paint, right now I'm leaning towards black :)

 

Brad

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Black shocks blend in with the undercarriage and hide dirt, and the old shocks I pulled off of the 1-ton still had some black paint on them so maybe that's the way they came from the factory...lighter colored shocks never look as good as when they come out of the box if ya drive in all road conditions, but if they start leaking, the dirt staining can be noticed at a glance which helps with maintenance...I put new Monroes on the Quad Cab this spring, and the rear ones were silver, just as advertised, but the fronts were black...dealing with OEMs, I know it's common practice to have a preferred finish specified for parts, but they will ship product out the door with whatever finish they have on the shelf so they can invoice customers and meet their quotas :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I need some for my 4 tonner...any color will do?

OE Monroe Shock Big Red.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A potential relief to your maintenance budget could be this little trick that I've used:  in recent years, Monroe has advertised rebates in the spring as well as Shock-tober...couple this with online discounts from Advance Auto or O'Reilly Auto, and the net result has been buy 2 shocks, get 2 free...

I have delayed shock and strut purchases to reap this significant savings on several vehicles in the last 10+ years, and parlayed my savings with a similar approach to tire replacement at Firestone in the spring and fall...ironically, I was told about both discounts by salesmen at local stores as I have been a good customer with my many project vehicles...

So if you have to deal with these maintenance issues and can delay these purchases for a few weeks, take the time and do some research, ask a few strategic questions with the local sales staff, and at the end of the day, your wallet might still be heavy enough to afford putting cheese on your hamburger :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Thanks JBNeal for this invaluable resource. 

 

I bought 4 Gabriel 8265’s for my 52 b3c a few months ago and just got around to installing them. The fit on the rear was fine but on the front they are too short. The front on my 3/4 ton is 20.25, the Gabriel and Monroe shocks only extend to 19.25. I can’t find any 11/16 mount shocks that extend to 20.25. For now, I put the old shocks back on the front and will dig around for replacements. I read some posts where others have used the 5/8 mount shocks instead, not sure how well they wear.

 

-roland

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I had kinda explained earlier, the axle articulation range may exceed the shock absorber stroke, but if it's by 1 inch, then you only have to worry about that deficiency if one wheel is driving over a very deep pothole or if the truck has become airborn...for the rest of the time, the new shocks should work well because they should not bottom out or go full extension during normal operating conditions...I haven't put a GoPro on it, but my guess is that the suspension travel is +/- 4" from neutral during street driving :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely use that floor jack for the assist...on many vehicles with an independent front suspension, the vehicle has to be raised high enough for the shock to be removed from underneath, but then lowered to attach the shock properly to the frame and suspension shock mounts...I recall on my '89 and '92 Dakotas, I had to put the frame on jack stands then put a floor jack under the tire to raise the suspension a few inches to install the shock nut on the stud under the hood :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/6/2020 at 9:19 AM, JBNeal said:

Definitely use that floor jack for the assist...on many vehicles with an independent front suspension, the vehicle has to be raised high enough for the shock to be removed from underneath, but then lowered to attach the shock properly to the frame and suspension shock mounts...I recall on my '89 and '92 Dakotas, I had to put the frame on jack stands then put a floor jack under the tire to raise the suspension a few inches to install the shock nut on the stud under the hood :cool:

JBNeal, Thanks again for posting this information here,  so grateful for this site and the knowledge found here. I put the front shocks on last night with the weight on the truck, with no issue. Just had to crank the wheels hard left and right to get to them. It rides so much better - those original shocks were completely gone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Terms of Use