Jump to content

Dodgeb4ya

Members
  • Posts

    9,962
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    174

Posts posted by Dodgeb4ya

  1. On 4/3/2024 at 3:20 PM, E37Bruco said:

    I'm not sure when I'll be at the truck again but looking at the diaphragm cleaned up I found a seal where that barrel slides. Ordered a new Timken version of it 🤞 (480356).

     

    I'll still look to see if there's a seal between the shaft and that barrel. 

     

    20240403_173841.jpg

    The seal shown is the only seal...

    There is only an extremly strong bottoming/over travel diaphram spring behind the snap ring and washer in the barrel part...

     

  2. AFAIK the seal is inside that housing the shift rod operates in and out of.

    There is a snap ring to get into it....but if you get into trouble guessing on trying to get at a seal you might end up pulling the 400lb diff out!😫

    Clean it up and run it....had a lot of 80/140 gear oil in it!

     

     

    20240323_173334_Li07Qb6446_P27cqfRi7D.jpeg

  3. There shouldn't be any  oil on the axle vacuum side.

    I have never taken apart the shifter shaft and sleeve assembly in one of these Timkin rear ends.

    I'm sure there are one or more oil seals in there.

    No service information anywhere that I could find.

    The rear end pictured pictured above worked flawlessly with the oil in it.

    Shifted great.

    I was suprised to find the oil in it.

  4. And with the upper line 131" WB New Yorker and Imperial power brakes were std.

    Power steering and windows plus a real torque converter were optional starting in 1951.

    I had a Fluid Torque Drive Saratoga.

    It was easy to smoke the tires from a dead stop in that short WB Windsor.

    I have also had a couple of the upper line 51-52 New Yorker and short WB Imperials. Luxurious cars.

     

  5. On 3/22/2024 at 1:24 PM, E37Bruco said:

     

    I doubt Whitepost could supply or replace the diaphragm.

    The diaphragm's and base mount  were sold as a complete assembly...no separate parts from MoPar.

    This is what the leaky situation probably will be....there is a very strong spring in that vacumn chamber....

    Once the 1/2" nut in the hole of the outer cover and the 12 screws holding the diaphram are removed....those parts are likely to go flying.

    Use two 2" long safety screws to control the cover and diaphragm's gradual release off the shifter rod.

    20240323_153740_SonVrLhG1R.jpeg.7c2410fd0eaa464b3d435f5b9cfed2ec.jpeg

    20240324_125819_8Y7Yrckg0n.jpeg

    20240323_174913_kiki25O39S_VvyYQfz687.jpeg

    • Thanks 1
  6. There should be no oil getting into the rubber shift diaphram.

    It will cause damage the hose and to diaphram. 

    There is no servicable seal in the shift rod. I have never had that rod apart or seen a seal in it.

    If there is excessive oil and it has damaged that diaphram you have a bug priblem.

    I definately would check the shifter rubber diaphram for oil contamination and possible swelling or splits.

    A compromised rubber diaphram will cause axle shifting trouble...which you have had trouble with.

    You might want to remove the 12 screws to be able to be sure that diaphram has no holes or cracks from oil damage.

    It might be A-ok too.

  7. MoPar started posting maximum drum oversize's around 1956...

    I know most drums machining limit is at .060" OS. A maximum safe cut on the drum lathe bit is at .030" ....means the drum ends up at .060".

    But I also know some  late 50's model Chrysler 12" drums are spec'd at a max drum oversize of .090".

    Shown is a MoPar pic of some center plane brakes maxed at .060" oversize cut.

    Anything over .060" will require over size linings for proper shoe arc'ing and long lining life.

    More meat on the drums is a good thing.?

     

     

    20240306_204231_aEp3Y0Lk12.jpeg

  8. Did your machist fab up a torque plate for honing the block?

    Wonder how much distortion of the cylinder walls will be after the head is torqued.

    Answer to question # 1....no.

    It would be a $$$% custom fabrication.

    I'd assemble and run it.

    You are digging way to deep IMO.

    Modern engines....be real careful.

     

  9. Study the old original e-brake cable and note routing.

    Hopefully it is the original and routed as OE designed.

    I myself have never removed the whole front floor pan which also requires removing all the carpet and front seat let alone another 20 plus bolts and throttle linkage. Anyway....

      At the hand brake handle there are two bolts that position and clamp the end of the cable housing to the hand brake handle assembly.

    There is aslo a clevis pin with a cotter pin to remove at the hand brake lever.

    Next thing to remove is a double screwed aluminum clamp ring retaining the rubber grommet and cable located at the upper drivers side of the firewall.

    Then remove the E- brake cable clamp bolt at the lower steering column.

    The e-brake cable is routed between the engine rear cross member and bell housing cover...stays close to the drivers side lower rubber engine mount.

    Just rear of this cross member there is a cable end retaining clamp located on the transmission side cover...remove the bolt and nut...pull cable end out of this retaining clamp.

    Under the car at the rear of the transmission remove the  e-brake return spring, cable yoke clevis pin, also remove two nuts retaining the cable end "U" yoke....remove said yoke.

    Remove cable assembly from car noting proper original routing.

    Install the new cable in reverse order.

    Adjust cable down at transmission brake band for proper e-brake operation.

    A fun little project..not too difficult...a little tight up by the handle brake.?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Terms of Use